Pharmaco-economic evaluation of kidney transplantation at the University Hospital Establishment of Oran: cost analysis and implications / Évaluation pharmaco-économique de la transplantation rénale à l'établissement hospitalier et universitaire d'Oran : analyse des coûts et implications.

Introduction: In Algeria, the number of patients treated by dialysis is estimated at 23,798 in 2019. Kidney transplantation is the best therapeutic option for patients suffering from end stage kidney Disease (ESKD). However, this procedure is costly and requires complex management. The aim of this study is to assess the costs associated with kidney transplantation at the University Hospital Establishment of Oran, Algeria (UHEO). Materials and methods: A retrospective, descriptive, monocentric study was carried out on 31 patients who underwent kidney transplantation at the UHEO. Estimated costs included drugs, consumables, imaging and laboratory tests for pre-transplant examinations, immediate post-transplant hospitalization, post-transplant follow-up and management of any complications. Results: The average cost of graft preparation was 485,438.31 Algerian Dinar (DZD). Immediate post-transplant hospitalization represented an average cost of 375,484.70 DZD. The first year post-transplantation was the most costly with an average cost of 1,305,197.40 DZD mainly attributed to treatment, hospitalization, clinical and paraclinical examinations. Conclusion: This study estimated the cost of kidney transplantation at the UHEO and revealed that the cost of the first year is the most important due to many factors. It also showed that costs tend to decrease with the age of the transplant and the clinical stability of the recipient.

Introduction: En Algérie, le nombre de patients traités par la dialyse est estimé à 23 798 en 2019. La transplantation rénale se positionne comme la meilleure option thérapeutique pour les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique terminale (IRCT). Cependant, cette procédure est coûteuse et nécessite une prise en charge complexe. Cette étude a pour objectif d'évaluer les coûts associés à la transplantation rénale à l'établissement hospitalier et universitaire d'Oran en Algérie (EHUO). Matériels et méthodes: Une étude rétrospective, descriptive et monocentrique a été menée sur 31 patients ayant subi une transplantation rénale avec un donneur vivant apparenté à l'EHUO. Les coûts estimés englobaient les médicaments, les consommables, l'imagerie et les bilans biologiques dans les examens pré-greffe du donneur et du receveur, l'hospitalisation post-greffe immédiate, le suivi post-greffe et la gestion d'éventuelles complications. Résultats: Le coût moyen de la préparation de la greffe était de 485 438,31 Dinar algérien (DZD). L'hospitalisation post-greffe immédiate a représenté un coût moyen de 375 484,70 DZD. La première année de la greffe était la plus coûteuse avec un coût moyen de 1 305 197,40 DZD principalement attribué au traitement, à l'hospitalisation et aux examens cliniques et paracliniques. Les infections urinaires, la Covid-19 et les complications chirurgicales étaient les complications les plus fréquentes. Une variabilité significative a été observée en fonction du type de complications allant de 1 785,48 à 654 214,60 DZD. Le rejet aigu du greffon a été associé au coût moyen le plus élevé. Conclusion: Cette étude a permis d'estimer le coût de la greffe rénale à l'EHUO et a révélé que le coût de la première année est le plus important en raison de plusieurs facteurs. Elle a également montré que les coûts ont tendance à diminuer au fur à mesure de l'ancienneté de la greffe et la stabilité clinique du receveur.

Pharmacoeconomics of medicines used for geriatric individuals in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi.

BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES: Expenditure on healthcare is a major concern in the geriatric age group. The current study was carried out to assess the expenditure patterns on medicines utilized in geriatric inpatients. METHODS: An observational study was conducted on 1000 geriatric inpatients, aged ≥60 yr, admitted to the medicine unit. Data were collected regarding demographic characteristics, prescribed medicines, expenditure incurred on medicines, appropriateness of medicines prescribed and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Appropriateness of the prescribed medicines was determined using the American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria. RESULTS: Geriatric inpatients comprised 41.3 per cent of the total individuals admitted in the ward during the study period. A total of 8366 medicines were prescribed in 127 formulations. The total expenditure on prescribed medicines was INR 1,087,175 with a per capita expenditure of INR 1087.17. Parenteral medicines accounted for 91 per cent of the expenditure on medicines. Maximum expenditure (70%) was incurred on 11.9 per cent of the medicines prescribed. The per capita expenditure was significantly higher in individuals with comorbidities (P=0.03) and those who had a longer duration of hospital stay (P<0.0001). About 28.1 per cent prescriptions were inappropriate. ADRs (140) were observed in 139 (13.9%) inpatients. Individuals with inappropriate medicines prescriptions and ADRs had a longer duration of hospital stay and more number of medicines prescribed. INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities, prolonged hospitalization, polypharmacy, inappropriate medicines and parenteral medicines being prescribed contribute to increased expenditure on medicines in geriatric inpatients. In view of the rising number of geriatric inpatients, there is a need to frame a drug policy for them along with surveillance of expenditure on prescribed medicines. This needs to be treated as a priority.

The effectiveness and pharmacoeconomic study of using different corticosteroids in the treatment of hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

PURPOSE: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are caused by inflammation and/or fibrosis of alveolar walls resulting in impaired gas exchange. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is the third most common type of ILDs. Corticosteroids are the mainstay treatment for HP. The use of intramuscular (IM) betamethasone or intravenous (IV) dexamethasone as weekly pulse doses has shown higher benefit than daily oral prednisolone for HP patients. The aim of this study is to directly compare different corticosteroids in terms of effectiveness and in monetary values and perform an economic evaluation. METHODS: One hundred and seven patients were tested for pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and inflammatory markers to assess the treatment effectiveness. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed. ICERs between 3 treatment groups were calculated. RESULTS: Post treatment, Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels significantly improved in betamethasone group from 723.22 ± 218.18 U/ml to 554.48 ± 129.69 U/ml (p = 0.001). A significant improvement in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) occurred in the dexamethasone group from 56.12 ± 27.97 mm to 30.06 ± 16.04 mm (p = 0.048). A significant improvement in forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and six-minute walk distance (6MWD) was observed within the three treatment groups. A significant improvement in oxygen desaturation percentage (SpO2) occurred within dexamethasone and betamethasone groups. Betamethasone and dexamethasone were found more cost-effective than prednisolone as their ICERs fell in quadrant C. Furthermore, ICER between betamethasone and dexamethasone was performed; a small difference in cost was found compared to the higher benefit of betamethasone. CONCLUSION: Betamethasone and dexamethasone were found to be more effective than prednisolone in improving the inflammatory reaction and the clinical features of HP patients. Betamethasone was found to be the best intervention in terms of cost against the effect.

Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Biologics in Japan: A Single-Center, Retrospective Pharmacoeconomic Study.

Biologics are essential for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, only a few studies have validated cost-effective treatment options and patient factors for biologic use using real-world data from Japanese patients with IBD. Here, we aimed to provide pharmacoeconomic evidence to support clinical decisions for IBD treatment using biologics. We assessed 183 cases (127 patients) of IBD treated with biologics between November 2004 and September 2021. Data on patient background, treatment other than biologics, treatment-related medical costs, and effectiveness index (ratio of the C-reactive protein-negative period to drug survival time) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Drug survival was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis. The outcomes were to validate a novel assessment index and elucidate the following aspects using this index: the effectiveness-cost relationship of long-term biologic use in IBD and cost-effectiveness-associated patient factors. Body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 and duration of hypoalbuminemia during drug survival correlated significantly with the therapeutic effectiveness of biologics. There were no significant differences in surgical, granulocyte apheresis, or adverse-event costs per drug survival time. Biologic costs were significantly higher in the group showing lower effectiveness than in the group showing higher effectiveness. These findings hold major pharmacoeconomic implications for not only improving therapeutic outcomes through the amelioration of low albumin levels and obesity but also potentially reducing healthcare expenditure related to the use of biotherapeutics. To our knowledge, this is the first pharmacoeconomic study based on real-world data from Japanese patients with IBD receiving long-term biologic therapy.

The Checklist for Standard Methodological Requirements and Reporting of Economic Evaluation of Medicines in Slovakia.

OBJECTIVES: We have developed a scientifically well-grounded, methodological, and reporting checklist for economic evaluation (EE) of medicines in the Slovak health technology assessment process, which serves as a supplement to the Slovak pharmacoeconomic guidelines. METHODS: The checklist was developed using an iterative process in which items were generated and gradually added to the baseline checklist based on shortcomings identified in an analysis of Slovak EEs, using relevant published checklists, and Slovak, as well as international, methodological guidance that was identified in the systematic literature review. The selection of checklist recommendations, their clarity, and relevance to the Slovak setting were validated in the online survey. RESULTS: From the sample of 151 price and reimbursement submissions published between January 2018 and July 2021, almost half of them (n = 73) received at least 1 request from the Ministry of Healthcare to justify or modify the methodology used in the EE; and in 18 proceedings, a negative opinion was issued because of shortcomings identified in the EE. The 25-items preliminary checklist, resulting from an iterative working process, has been validated in an online survey conducted among members of ISPOR Chapter Slovakia. After incorporating relevant comments, the final proposal for the Slovak checklist consists of 55 recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The research represented the first attempt to create a Slovak EE checklist, which serves as a part of ISPOR Slovakia pharmacoeconomic guidelines. Implementation of the checklist allows checking whether EE meets legislative and methodological requirements and thus helps in improving the appropriateness and standardization of EEs in Slovakia.

The role of insurance policies in the drug pricing landscape.

INTRODUCTION: This overview paper aims at summarizing and analyzing the available literature on healthcare system organization and pricing policies of 11 European countries, comparing them to the Bulgarian pharmaceutical system. The countries were selected based on the reference basket for the pricing of pharmaceuticals in Bulgaria - Belgium, Greece, Spain, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, and France. AREAS COVERED: In the first part, we explore the health system models in the above-mentioned countries. In the second part we explore the pricing and reimbursement policies, and in the third part we analyze healthcare and pharmaceutical economic indicators, as well as life expectancy. The major focus of the review is the outpatient care. EXPERT OPINION: In this work, we attempted to outline differences and similarities between the countries of interest. Despite the differences in their healthcare system organization, health and pharmaceutical expenditures constantly increased during the observed 2 decades. This increase in expenditures, however, has not had a significant impact on life-expectancy. Minor increases were observed - from 2 to 4 years total. No country had an expectancy above 85 years of age. It might be said that other factors are influencing the life expectancy to a greater extent.

Evaluating the cost utility of estradiol plus dydrogesterone for the treatment of menopausal women in China.

AIM: Evaluate the cost utility of menopausal hormone therapy for women in China. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A bespoke Markov cost utility model was developed to evaluate a cohort of symptomatic perimenopausal women (>45 years) with intact uterus in China in accordance with China's Pharmacoeconomic guideline. Short (5-year) and long (10-year) treatment durations were evaluated over a lifetime model time horizon with 12-month cycle duration. Societal and healthcare payer perspectives were evaluated in the context of a primary care provider/prescriber, outpatient setting with inpatient care for patients with chronic conditions. Disease risk and mortality parameters were derived from focused literature searches, and China Diagnosis-related Group cost data was included. Comprehensive scenario, univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were undertaken along with independent validation. This is the first model to include MHT-related disease risks. RESULTS: According to base case results, the total cost for MHT was 22,516$ (150,106¥) and total quality adjusted life years 12.32 versus total cost of no MHT 30,824$ (205,495¥) and total quality adjusted life years 11.16 resulting in a dominant incremental cost effectiveness ratio of -7,184$ (-47,898¥) per QALY. Results hold true over a range of univariate deterministic sensitivity and scenario analyses. Probabilistic analysis showed a 91% probability of being cost effective at a willingness to pay threshold of three times Gross Domestic Product per capita in China. CONCLUSION: Contingent on the structure and assumptions of the model, combination of estradiol plus dydrogesterone MHT is potentially cost saving in symptomatic women over the age of 45 years in China.

Menopausal hormone therapy is publicly funded in many countries to alleviate symptoms of menopause; however, uptake has been comparatively slow in China. This has implications for the estimated 168 million menopausal-aged women. This analysis is the first to evaluate the cost effectiveness of menopausal hormone therapy in China using best practice principles and incorporating longer term disease risks. Menopausal hormone therapy is potentially cost saving in the context of China.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of stroke and myocardial infarction prevention in hypertensive patients: Markov model based on the ACCOMPLISH trial.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the pharmacoeconomics of amlodipine combined with benazepril and hydrochlorothiazide combined with benazepril in the treatment of hypertension using a Markov model to provide an evidence-based reference for clinical drug use. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we constructed two types of Markov model using data from the ACCOMPLISH (Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension) trial to dynamically simulate the development of hypertension. The models were subjected to rollback analysis and cohort analysis to obtain the cost and effectiveness of the two drug regimens in preventing stroke and myocardial infarction in hypertensive patients. We conducted sensitivity analysis to determine the stability of the results. RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness of amlodipine combined with benazepril was 66,196.97 RMB with 6.59 QALYs and that of hydrochlorothiazide combined with benazepril was 74,588.50 RMB with 6.46 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of hydrochlorothiazide + benazepril was -64,550.23 compared with amlodipine + benazepril. The amlodipine + benazepril regimen was therefore more cost-effective than hydrochlorothiazide combined with benazepril. The sensitivity analysis results showed that the model was robust. CONCLUSION: Compared with the hydrochlorothiazide + benazepril treatment regimen, the amlodipine + benazepril regimen showed greater economic benefits.

Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: China's National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) has become the primary route for drug reimbursement in China. More recently, the authority has made pharmacoeconomic evaluation an integral part of the application for NRDL inclusion. The underlying financial conflict of interests (FCOI) of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, however, has the potential to influence evidence generated and thus subsequent decision-making yet remains poorly understood. METHODS: We searched for studies published between January 2012 and January 2022 on the 174 drugs added to the 2017-2020 NRDLs after successful negotiation. We categorised the study's FCOI status into no funding, industry funding, non-profit funding and multiple fundings based on authors' disclosure and assessed the reporting quality of included studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 checklist. We compiled descriptive statistics of funding types and study outcomes using t-tests and χ2 tests and conducted multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 378 records and our final sample included 92 pharmacoeconomic evaluations, among which 69.6% were conducted with at least one funding source. More than half (57.6%) of the evaluations reached favourable conclusions towards the intervention drug and 12.6% reached a dominant result of the intervention drug over the comparison from model simulation. The reporting quality of included studies ranged from 19 to 25 (on a scale of 28), with an average of 22.3. The statistical tests indicated that industry-funded studies were significantly more likely to conclude that the intervention therapy was economical (p<0.01) and had a significantly higher proportion of resulting target drug economically dominated the comparison drug (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The study revealed that FCOI bias is common in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations conducted in Chinese settings and could significantly influence the study's economical results and conclusions through various mechanisms. Multifaceted efforts are needed to improve transparency, comparability and reporting standardisation.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anti-obesity drugs for chronic weight management: a systematic review of literature.

Introduction: Pharmacological therapy is recommended as a second-line alternative to reverse obesity. Currently, five anti-obesity drugs (AODs) have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for chronic weight management. The aim of this paper is to investigate the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of AODs through a systematic review with a special focus on methodological considerations. Methods: We searched the general and specific databases to identify the primary pharmacoeconomic evaluation of AODs. Results: A total of 18 full-text articles and three conference abstracts were included in this review. Most of the economic assessments were still about Orlistat. And the observations we could make were consistent with the previous systematic review. A few studies were on the combined therapies (i.e. PHEN/TPM ER and NB ER) compared to different comparators, which could hardly lead to a generalized summary of the cost-effectiveness. Most recently, pharmacoeconomic evidence on the newest GLP 1 RA approved for the indication of obesity or obesity with at least one comorbidity emerged gradually. Modelling-based cost-utility analysis is the major type of assessment method. In the modelling studies, a manageable number of the key health states and the state transitions were structured to capture the disease progression. In particular, the principal structure of the decision model adopted in the three studies on the newly approved drug was nearly the same, which enables more in-depth comparisons and generalizations of the findings. Conclusion: This study provided an up-to-date overview of the strengths and areas for improvement in the methodological design of the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the licensed drugs for chronic weight management. Future modelling evaluations would benefit from a better understanding of the long-term weight loss effects of the current therapeutic options and the weight rebound process after the discontinuation of treatment. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022302648, identifier CRD42022302648.

Comparative Pharmacoeconomic Effectiveness of Interleukin-17 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis.

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of IL-17 inhibitors (SEC, IXE, NTK) in the treatment of adult patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the healthcare system of the Russian Federation. Materials and methods. The study is a sub-analysis of a previously published systematic review and network meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of biologics in adult patients with AS in the Russian Federation. NNT values were calculated for BASDAI 50 and ASAS 20/40 after 16 weeks of therapy for all studied drugs. CpR was estimated for each biologic after 16 weeks and one year of therapy. Additionally, we carried out an assessment of the financial burden of the most cost-effective strategies for the treatment of AS. The use of NTK is characterized by an average of no more than three patients needed to treat to achieve one ASAS 20/40 or BASDAI 50 response, while on IXE and SEC no more than 4-5 patients need to be treated, depending on the estimated effectiveness criterion. According to CpR estimate, NTK is the most cost-effective IL-17 inhibitor for the treatment of AS, both after 16 weeks and after one year of therapy. The obtained results make it possible to compare the effectiveness of IL-17 inhibitors from a clinical and economic points of view and can be used both in decision making on treatment strategies for individual patients and at the population level when deciding on the reimbursement of drugs.

Association of arbitrary prescribing behavior to costly drug expenditures: a pharmacoeconomic study in primary care.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the cost-related prescribing performance of primary care physicians who had a higher versus lower tendency of arbitrary prescribing. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated the prescriptions of primary care physicians in Istanbul, collected with 3:1 systematic sampling. We determined higher versus lower arbitrary prescribing by the physician's degree of writing the solo diagnosis of "Z00- General examination without diagnosis/complaint": those for whom such prescriptions constituted >5% were classified as Group A and those with them at <0.5% as Group B. We compared these two groups by the total and disease-specific drug costs per prescription they produced for 10 frequently encountered indications. RESULTS: The median cost of disease-specific medication for all diagnoses in Group A and Group B, except anemia, was equal. In upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), hypertension, anemia, diabetes, and conjunctivitis, the mean prescription costs of Group A were significantly higher than those of Group B (P < .001, P < .001, P = .009, P = .007, and P < .001, respectively), whereas disease-specific drug costs per prescription were similar (P > .05 in all diagnoses). In myalgia, Group A had lower cost per prescription (P < .001) and higher analgesic costs per prescription (P < .001) compared to those in Group B. We found significantly higher disease-specific drug cost share in Group B for URTIs (antibiotic), gastroesophageal reflux disease (gastric acid-suppressant), hypertension (antihypertensive), anemia (iron preparations), diabetes (antidiabetic), depression (antidepressant), and conjunctivitis (corticosteroid) than those in Group A (P < .001 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that physicians who had a higher tendency of prescribing for no clear indication are also more likely to produce costly prescriptions.

Pharmacoeconomic issues in stem cell mobilization.

BACKGROUND: recently, stem cell mobilization has made dramatic progress, that ended up in an increasing number of aphereses at target for autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The aim of this research is investigating the cost-effectiveness of stem cell mobilization. METHODS: a narrative review of the literature was carried out, searching for primary contributions written in English and published during 2000-2023 on cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of stem cell mobilization in patients entitled to ASCT. The PubMed database was searched with the following sets of keywords: cost-effectiveness AND apheresis AND myeloma (PubMed_1); cost-effectiveness AND stem cell mobilization (PubMed_2). Articles included in the analysis were assessed via two different checklists. RESULTS: sixty-six entries were retrieved. Five out of 66 (PubMed_1: 4 out 17; PubMed_2: 1 out of 49), 4 CEAs and 1 cost-utility analysis (CUA) fit the research goal. Four out of 5 contributions proved to be in line with most of the items included in the two assessment grids. However, the most relevant missing features in some of the included contributions were: study perspective, healthcare resources valuation, and sensitivity analyses. DISCUSSION: most of the articles included in this research show that chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization is cost-effective according to different standpoints. Future health economic research on this topic should establish local threshold values for incremental apheresis at target and explore the heterogeneity of CEA (and CUA) to determine oncohaematological diseases and patient categories for which chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization is cost-effective in different healthcare systems, given local budget constraints.

Emergent challenges and opportunities in drug discovery and commercialization.

We review medical economics literature presented at the 2023 annual AEA-ASSA convention, the largest gathering of economists worldwide. Pharmacoeconomic papers addressed a wide range of issues, including gender and racial gaps in clinical trials, hospital credit financing, drug rebates, covid-19 vaccine equality, and the opioid epidemic. Yet, they had some common identifiable themes. We examine them in the context of the "twin towers" of biopharmaceutical innovation: discovery and commercialization. Implementation outcomes and relative success of innovative solutions - whether in terms of products and services, structural design and arrangements, or policies - depend on how adequately they respond to questions and challenges that arise in drug discovery and commercialization, and who gains from them. That innovation's beneficiaries might not equally gain from its intended advantages is another unifying theme in the reviewed literature. Against this backdrop, biopharmaceutical innovation can breed new challenges and opportunities. And health policy can perform a critical, leveling function that reduces cost, increases access, and ensures quality of biopharmaceutical solutions.

Análise das ações tomadas pela comissão de farmácia e terapêutica do Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia em 2021 e 2022 / Analysis of the actions taken by the pharmacy and therapeutics committee of the Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia in 2021 and 2022

INTRODUÇÃO E OBJETIVOS: A Comissão de Farmácia e Terapêutica (CFT) é uma instância de caráter consultivo e deliberativo que assessora a Diretoria Geral com objetivo de formular diretrizes e promover uso racional de medicamentos. O objetivo foi mensurar decisões tomadas pela CFT que impactem positivamente para economia de recurso orçamentário sem prejuízo assistencial. MÉTODOS: Estudo descritivo realizado no período de janeiro de 2021 a dezembro de 2022 sobre as ATAS mensais da CFT e sistema de gestão hospitalar eletrônica. Os dados coletados foram: assuntos discutidos, deliberação, valor unitário do medicamento. Foi considerado assuntos com impacto financeiro: substituição da padronização, despadronização, inclusão de medicamento com dosagem de melhor manejo, inclusão de restrição de prescrição para itens de alto valor. Os dados foram coletados em planilha Excel. RESULTADOS E DISCUSSÃO: Foram avaliadas 24 ATAS de CFT, em que foram selecionados temas voltados para farmacoeconomia. Do total, havia 5 pautas (21%) focadas no assunto: despadronização: 2 (40%): metoprolol 100 mg (tem de 50 mg), bosentana 62,5 mg (pertence ao Componente Especializado e o paciente já faz uso domiciliar e passa a ser orientado a trazer de casa), substituição: 1 (20%) sildenafila de 20 mg para 50 mg (preço unit de $12,20 para $0,49), inclusão de dosagem: 1 (20%) alteplase 10 mg ($491,19) sendo que o alteplase 50 mg custa $ 2.356,55 (dose depende do peso e havia desperdício) e inclusão de restrição 1 (20%): levosimendana ($4.900,00). Baseado no consumo anual, fizemos o cálculo de economia: metoprolol e bosentana ($4.373,37), sildenafila ($109.383,11), alteplase ($17.971,22), levosimendana ($ 88.200,00). Essa mudança não deixou o paciente desassistido, pois foi considerado substituições viáveis envolvendo o corpo clínico para adequação de prescrições médicas e apoio da Diretoria Clínica. CONCLUSÃO: Na busca de diminuir gastos com medicamentos sem afetar a assistência do paciente, a Comissão de Farmácia e Terapêutica possibilitou meios para economizar recurso orçamentário, promovendo reuniões extras com alguns setores estratégicos para demonstrar gastos com determinados itens e propor medidas que pudessem minimizar esse impacto financeiro. Houve uma compreensão e aceitação das áreas envolvidas. No montante, o hospital conseguiu economizar R$ 219.927,70. Financiamento e agradecimento: Aos membros da Comissão de Farmácia e Terapêutica que opinaram e sugeriram alternativas terapêuticas plausíveis.

Interventional pharmacoeconomics for immune checkpoint inhibitors through alternative dosing strategies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for the treatment of a variety of cancer types. The doses of these drugs, though approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have never been optimised, likely leading to significantly higher doses than required for optimal efficacy. Dose optimisation would hypothetically decrease the risk, severity, and duration of immune-related adverse events, as well as provide an opportunity to reduce costs through interventional pharmacoeconomic strategies such as off-label dose reductions or less frequent dosing. We summarise existing evidence for ICI dose optimisation to advocate for the role of interventional pharmacoeconomics.